Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  27 128 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 27 128 Next Page
Page Background

Special Issue: Future of Cell Biology

Review

Applications of CRISPR

Genome Engineering in Cell

Biology

Fangyuan Wang

1

and Lei S. Qi

2,3,4,

*

Recent advances in genome engineering are starting a revolution in biological

research and translational applications. The clustered regularly interspaced

short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-associated RNA-guided endonuclease

CRISPR associated protein 9 (Cas9) and its variants enable diverse manipu-

lations of genome function. In this review, we describe the development of Cas9

tools for a variety of applications in cell biology research, including the study of

functional genomics, the creation of transgenic animal models, and genomic

imaging. Novel genome engineering methods offer a new avenue to understand

the causality between the genome and phenotype, thus promising a fuller

understanding of cell biology.

From DNA Repair Pathways to CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing

Eukaryotic cells use a sophisticated network of genes and genomic regulatory elements to carry

out functions related to cell growth and death, organelle formation and organization, metabolite

production, and microenvironment sensing. The ability to precisely manipulate the genome is

essential to understanding complex and dynamic cellular processes. Broadly speaking, genome

engineering de

fi

nes methodological approaches to alter genomic DNA sequence (gene editing),

modify epigenetic marks (epigenetic editing), modulate functional output (transcriptional regula-

tion), and reorganize chromosomal structure (structural manipulation) (Figure 1). These goals

require a toolkit of designer molecules that can be conveniently constructed and delivered into

cells to perform one of the above functions.

Naturally occurring systems and pathways have provided a rich resource for tool building. The

discovery of the homology-directed repair (HDR) pathway inspired a method to modify the DNA

sequence at a precise genomic locus in a targeted manner. Using the HDR pathway, a designed

DNA template with

fl

anking homologous sequences could be used to precisely recombine at the

target genomic locus [1]. However, this application is usually a highly inef

fi

cient process in

mammalian cells and tissues. By contrast, the presence of a double-stranded DNA break (DSB)

can enhance ef

fi

ciency [2,3]. Furthermore, it has been shown that, in the absence of a DNA

template, eukaryotic cells may generate almost random deletion or insertion indels at the site of a

DSB via the alternative nonhomology end joining (NHEJ) pathway, offering another approach for

targeted gene knockout [4].

Following the developments described above, a major question in the

fi

eld of gene editing was

how to introduce site-speci

fi

c DSBs to initiate the DNA repair process. Molecules that allow

sequence-speci

fi

c DNA binding were of primary interest. These included programmable

Trends

The RNA-guided CRISPR/Cas9 endo-

nuclease and the endonuclease-dead

dCas9 protein are powerful genomic

[4_TD$DIFF]

manipulation tools for gene editing,

transcriptional regulation, and epige-

netic modi

fi

cations.

Both Cas9 and dCas9 enable diverse

types of high-throughput screening of

gene functions in cell lines and

in vivo.

The CRISPR/Cas9 accelerates the

establishment of many useful trans-

genic animal models for biomedical

research.

The CRISPR/Cas9 is repurposed for

genomic imaging and lineage tracing

in living cells and tissues.

1

Sino-U.S. Center of Synthetic

Biology, Shanghai Institute of

Rheumatology, Renji Hospital, School

of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong

University, Shanghai, China

2

Department of Bioengineering,

Stanford University, Stanford, CA

94305, USA

3

Department of Chemical and

Systems Biology, Stanford University,

Stanford, CA 94305, USA

4

ChEM-H, Stanford University,

Stanford, CA 94305, USA

*Correspondence:

stanley.qi@stanford.edu

(L.S. Qi).

Trends in Cell Biology, November 2016, Vol. 26, No. 11

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2016.08.004

875

© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.